ModelSpec is an analysis of alternatives for AI models: it decides which models fit a job from your requirements, sourced benchmarks and real cost, and shows its work.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 for High volume (quality first), as of 2026-09-23

Find a text model for many short assistant requests where response quality still leads the ranking.

Worked example as of 2026-09-23, from the public data image.

What the evidence says

The evidence can't separate them for this job.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 has a 32% chance of matching or beating Claude Opus 5.5 on this job's objective.

probability bands: a model joins the leader when P(its score >= the leader's) >= 0.25 under the score posteriors; a weighted capability with an 80% interval wider than 2.8 is not enough evidence

Decision status: partial. P(best) and score intervals retain the full ranked lineup for this job, including models beyond this pair and models with thin evidence. Models with unknown objective values remain unranked and are outside this probability. P(best) is not a head-to-head probability.

Scores and score intervals use the objective's dimensionless normalised units. Cost per task is in USD for the selected offering and the applied spec's task size. When task size is omitted, the engine uses its documented default. Unavailable means the engine returned no value.

ModelScoreScore intervalP(best), ranked job lineupCost per task, USDSelected offering: provider / region / tierCapability estimates and intervals
Claude Opus 5.50.884932[0.71708, 1.052783]49%0.018anthropic / global / standard
  • chat_preference: 1.584232494; interval [0.565758585, 2.602706403]; benchmarks 1; direct benchmarks 1
Qwen3.8 Max 09020.79648[0.628628, 0.964331]15%0.007alibaba-model-studio / singapore / standard
  • chat_preference: 0.59037787; interval [-0.428096039, 1.60885178]; benchmarks 1; direct benchmarks 1

Short requests at scale; quality leads, cost counts.

Requirements

Preferences

Applied template spec
spec_version
1
where
  • model.class = text-generator
optimize
weights
chat_preference
0.7
-offering.cost_per_task
0.3
task_tokens
input
2000
output
500

Evidence for Claude Opus 5.5

BenchmarkVersionMeasurementUnitPublished intervalEvidence dateMeasurement conditionsProvenance
arena_webdevwebdev / overall, latest split, revision 1880dbebff5b1818.41Arena score (Elo scale)Unavailable2026-09-23
  • Effort: Unavailable
  • Subcategory: Unavailable
  • Harness: Unavailable
  • Measured by: independent_evaluator
  • Sample size: Unavailable
Source

Missing facts for Claude Opus 5.5

Evidence for Qwen3.8 Max 0902

BenchmarkVersionMeasurementUnitPublished intervalEvidence dateMeasurement conditionsProvenance
arena_webdevwebdev/latest, overall1660.58Arena score (Elo scale)Unavailable2026-09-23
  • Effort: Unavailable
  • Subcategory: Unavailable
  • Harness: Unavailable
  • Measured by: independent_evaluator
  • Sample size: Unavailable
Source

Missing facts for Qwen3.8 Max 0902

What this template teaches

Short task tokens make the cost term reflect one small request, not one long agent run.

Decision dec_f0ebf8d327afab69afc0e656 on public snapshot snap_05a963d2477ac2fb.

Read the full dated job answer.

The live board uses current data. This link applies the template to its full lineup.

Apply this template on Decide

Human lookup is free on Decide. CLI, API, and MCP access requires a key. Access and pricing.

Use-case examples · Model comparisons · How we decide

Feedback